The letter is "t" and the gender is guys!
Here are my favorite masculine "t" names of the moment:
- Tobias (I love "Toby" for a nickname, even if it is a "dog" name! And "Tobias" is so distinguished!)
- Tate (Uncommon but not weird, simple and strong)
- Thatcher (Going along with the surname trend...)
- Thaddeus (Both "Tad" and "Thad" are nice nicknames)
- Trace (One of our favorite "Louis L'Amour-esque" names)
- Tanian (Short from "Dartanian-" I'd never be likely to use it myself, but I remember a baseball player named "Tanian" after the muskateer, and he totally pulled it off. It's been dear to me ever since.)
I'm probably forgetting some..."t" names tend to be more unusual, unless you stick with something really common like "Thomas." What are your favorite masculine "t" names?
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
"K"
First off, my sister was gracious enough to comment on my post Premeditated Naming, so if you're interested in hearing how she ended up choosing a name, check out the comments.
Today: the gender is female and the letter is K. And C. and Q. Really anything that makes a "k" sound. Here are a few of my favorite "k" names for girls:
- Cora/Coral and many of its variations (I know a "Corabelle" and a "Coralee" and think they're so lovely)
- Kate (a true classic)
- Quinn (unique but simple and feminine)
- Kayla/Kaylee (they're too common for today, but maybe in a decade or two...they're such sweet names)
- Callie (I just love this name, and I really can't put my reasoning into words. It's just a terrific name!)
- Kendra (I've gotten flak for liking this name, which some classify as either "gangster" or "loose," but I stand by my longtime love of the name anyway )
I favor well-established "k" names, especially since there are so many made up ones these days. What are some of your favorite female "k" names?
Today: the gender is female and the letter is K. And C. and Q. Really anything that makes a "k" sound. Here are a few of my favorite "k" names for girls:
- Cora/Coral and many of its variations (I know a "Corabelle" and a "Coralee" and think they're so lovely)
- Kate (a true classic)
- Quinn (unique but simple and feminine)
- Kayla/Kaylee (they're too common for today, but maybe in a decade or two...they're such sweet names)
- Callie (I just love this name, and I really can't put my reasoning into words. It's just a terrific name!)
- Kendra (I've gotten flak for liking this name, which some classify as either "gangster" or "loose," but I stand by my longtime love of the name anyway )
I favor well-established "k" names, especially since there are so many made up ones these days. What are some of your favorite female "k" names?
Monday, July 18, 2011
Rainy Day Names
It is monsooning here in Flagstaff, and what better way to spend a rainy, thundery afternoon than musing about weather names?
Since I am a HUGE fan of rain in general, perhaps it is no surprise that I love the name "Raine." Now, I know that I am totally breaking one of my rules by adding an "e" to the end of the name, but I really think it makes it seem more complete, and less forecasty. I also like "Rainey;" it's sort of like an alternative to "Laney," which I also like, by the way. "Raine" makes a delightful middle name, if you or your husband are not quite enough committed to it to use it for a first name. "Zinnia Raine" is one of my favorite girl names (it's hippie enough for Flagstaff or Seattle), but since the spousey isn't a fan, one of you can use it! Zinnias are big, gorgeous, poofy flowers, by the way.
Other nice weather names? Well, "Sunny" is a little dated, though it's cheerful and sweet. More modern takes are "Sunshine" and anything with "Sol" in it, like "Solara." "Stormy" and "Gusty" are unusual, but you'd better hope your daughter isn't that tumultuous! "Snow," and it's Spanish equivalent "Nieve" are not too uncommon Blake informed me of a celebrity baby horrifically named "Reignbeau," and I'm sure there are a few little "Lightnings" out there.
Whatever your weather is right now, enjoy your afternoon! Happy naming!
Since I am a HUGE fan of rain in general, perhaps it is no surprise that I love the name "Raine." Now, I know that I am totally breaking one of my rules by adding an "e" to the end of the name, but I really think it makes it seem more complete, and less forecasty. I also like "Rainey;" it's sort of like an alternative to "Laney," which I also like, by the way. "Raine" makes a delightful middle name, if you or your husband are not quite enough committed to it to use it for a first name. "Zinnia Raine" is one of my favorite girl names (it's hippie enough for Flagstaff or Seattle), but since the spousey isn't a fan, one of you can use it! Zinnias are big, gorgeous, poofy flowers, by the way.
Other nice weather names? Well, "Sunny" is a little dated, though it's cheerful and sweet. More modern takes are "Sunshine" and anything with "Sol" in it, like "Solara." "Stormy" and "Gusty" are unusual, but you'd better hope your daughter isn't that tumultuous! "Snow," and it's Spanish equivalent "Nieve" are not too uncommon Blake informed me of a celebrity baby horrifically named "Reignbeau," and I'm sure there are a few little "Lightnings" out there.
Whatever your weather is right now, enjoy your afternoon! Happy naming!
Saturday, July 2, 2011
On Place Names
I like the idea of naming a child after a place of significance. This is an area for particular care, however...
Blake and I spent part of our first date sitting on a bench in West Seattle, enjoying the city skyline at night across Elliott Bay. I've always been fond of the name "Elliott" for a boy, and I like the fact that the name has significance for Blake and me. Plus- two sets of double letters!! But...it's not too likely that little "Elliott" would appreciate the romance behind his name. Maybe it would be different were it a daughter, but it seems cruel to burden a boy with a name with sappy connotations. Plus, "Elliott" has no good male nicknames. And I'm concerned it may go the way of "Ashley," "Lindsey," and "Taylor" and become more of a girl name.
If there's a place that is deeply special to you (and always will be), choosing a name reminiscent of the place can be extremely meaningful. For example, if your beloved grandparents were from Italy, perhaps naming a child "Romey" or "Venice" would be a fond reminder of them. I'd stay away from "Pompeii" though, since more cataclysmic images tend to come to mind than warm thoughts of the motherland. Along with that, it's best to discard places that people tend to make fun of, like "Detroit."
As long as the location in consideration doesn't have romantic associations for the parents that would potentially horrify/humiliate their offspring, and as long as there is SOME significance to the name (I think it's silly to name a kid "Brooklyn" or "Dakota" or "London" just because they're popular options), go for a place name! Some ideas:
- Biblical place names: one of my favorite girl names (I'm hesitant to write it since it will likely be the name of our next daughter) is a Biblical place name. Also, "Belen" (Bethleham in Spanish), Magdalena, Eden, Berea (my friend Aimee chose this lovely, unique name!), and Israel.
- Bodies of water, mountains, and landmarks: I grew up near Lake Meridian, and I always thought "Meridia" would make a nice name. Or I could use "Lillian," since the first lake I ever backpacked to was Lake Lillian. "Rainier" is a name I'll always love, since Mt. Rainier is the quintessential mountain, and is so emblematic of my western Washington roots. Other mountains? McKinley, Shasta, or Baker, perhaps? As far as landmark names go, why not Zion (could be a biblical name or a nod to the national park)?
- City/Country names: Well, my hometown is "Kent." It's sort of in the hood though, not really a place to pay homage to. Common choices include: "Paris," "Kenya," the previously mentioned "London," "Dakota," and "Brooklyn," and "India." Again, I beseech you to only pick a city/country name for your baby if you have some sort of connection to the place, not just because you like the way it sounds. At the same time, you don't want a name that you have too much connection to (naming our next child "Flagstaff" would be pretty ridiculous).
In summary, a place name can be a terrific, unique, and meaningful moniker for your child. Just consider any weird connotations the name may evoke, and analyze your motive in using the name. After all, you want your child to love his name, and hopefully the place it honors as well.
Blake and I spent part of our first date sitting on a bench in West Seattle, enjoying the city skyline at night across Elliott Bay. I've always been fond of the name "Elliott" for a boy, and I like the fact that the name has significance for Blake and me. Plus- two sets of double letters!! But...it's not too likely that little "Elliott" would appreciate the romance behind his name. Maybe it would be different were it a daughter, but it seems cruel to burden a boy with a name with sappy connotations. Plus, "Elliott" has no good male nicknames. And I'm concerned it may go the way of "Ashley," "Lindsey," and "Taylor" and become more of a girl name.
If there's a place that is deeply special to you (and always will be), choosing a name reminiscent of the place can be extremely meaningful. For example, if your beloved grandparents were from Italy, perhaps naming a child "Romey" or "Venice" would be a fond reminder of them. I'd stay away from "Pompeii" though, since more cataclysmic images tend to come to mind than warm thoughts of the motherland. Along with that, it's best to discard places that people tend to make fun of, like "Detroit."
As long as the location in consideration doesn't have romantic associations for the parents that would potentially horrify/humiliate their offspring, and as long as there is SOME significance to the name (I think it's silly to name a kid "Brooklyn" or "Dakota" or "London" just because they're popular options), go for a place name! Some ideas:
- Biblical place names: one of my favorite girl names (I'm hesitant to write it since it will likely be the name of our next daughter) is a Biblical place name. Also, "Belen" (Bethleham in Spanish), Magdalena, Eden, Berea (my friend Aimee chose this lovely, unique name!), and Israel.
- Bodies of water, mountains, and landmarks: I grew up near Lake Meridian, and I always thought "Meridia" would make a nice name. Or I could use "Lillian," since the first lake I ever backpacked to was Lake Lillian. "Rainier" is a name I'll always love, since Mt. Rainier is the quintessential mountain, and is so emblematic of my western Washington roots. Other mountains? McKinley, Shasta, or Baker, perhaps? As far as landmark names go, why not Zion (could be a biblical name or a nod to the national park)?
- City/Country names: Well, my hometown is "Kent." It's sort of in the hood though, not really a place to pay homage to. Common choices include: "Paris," "Kenya," the previously mentioned "London," "Dakota," and "Brooklyn," and "India." Again, I beseech you to only pick a city/country name for your baby if you have some sort of connection to the place, not just because you like the way it sounds. At the same time, you don't want a name that you have too much connection to (naming our next child "Flagstaff" would be pretty ridiculous).
In summary, a place name can be a terrific, unique, and meaningful moniker for your child. Just consider any weird connotations the name may evoke, and analyze your motive in using the name. After all, you want your child to love his name, and hopefully the place it honors as well.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Musings
The last couple weeks I've been caught up in a name that's a little unusual for me- kind of trendy, kind of gangster, but entirely lovely: "Mahalia." Mahalia is Hebrew (hence the trendiness- Hebrew names are quite popular right now) and means "Tenderness," which is very sweet. I can't imagine using the name myself, but someone should, because it would make me happy. If you happen to already have a daughter named, say, Kale'a, for example (ahem, Laura), "Mahalia" would make a very appropriate sibling name!
Other names on my radar:
"Laurel-" A lovely, feminine name suggested by a friend as an alternative to the very popular "Lauren."
"Gage/Gauge-" I have a weakness for manly, old west names. Blake trained in Phoenix last week with a Gage from Texas (figures)- named for the shotgun, of course!
"William-" It's my granddad's birthday today. He's a "Bill," and though I'm more partial to "Will" as a nickname for "William," it's a name you can't go wrong with. Unless your last name is Williams or something. Or the baby is a girl.
Other names on my radar:
"Laurel-" A lovely, feminine name suggested by a friend as an alternative to the very popular "Lauren."
"Gage/Gauge-" I have a weakness for manly, old west names. Blake trained in Phoenix last week with a Gage from Texas (figures)- named for the shotgun, of course!
"William-" It's my granddad's birthday today. He's a "Bill," and though I'm more partial to "Will" as a nickname for "William," it's a name you can't go wrong with. Unless your last name is Williams or something. Or the baby is a girl.
Thursday, June 23, 2011
Premeditated Naming
Blake and I are very much of the "have the name ready long before the baby arrives" mindset. It never even really occurred to me that "Aurora" might not be an "Aurora." Of course she would! If she wasn't, than she could become one. In fact, we have our son's name all set, just waiting for his October arrival. What if he doesn't look like a __________? Whatever, he'll be all nice and pink and wrinkly, and ___________ will suit him just fine.
However, I realize many people take a different, more diplomatic approach at the hospital/birthing center/home: have some names in mind, but go in with no expectations. For instance, my sister (who's baby girl is due any day) and her husband have three full names selected. They plan on seeing their daughter before deciding on one. Lindsay hopes they'll take one look and just know, but she's practical enough to know this does not always happen. Their strategy? They have one name they classify as very "delicate and beautiful, quite feminine," which they'll use if she has very fine, pretty features. The next name is reserved for a "cute, chubby, smooshy" baby. And the last? Well, they just decided on the last a week or two ago, mainly because Lindsay strongly felt they should go in with three names, not two. The last is their least favorite, they admit, but they like the meaning of it the best. Supposedly if the other two names seem not to fit, this last will work for a wide variety of babies. I'm most partial to their smooshy name myself, but all three are lovely, and I can't wait to find out who she is!
I also know of several people who did indeed go to the hospital etc. with a name all good and chosen, only to cast eyes upon their offspring and know instantly that the name would never do.
Another option is having no idea whatsoever what to name the baby, until two days after its birth you have to sign the birth certificate before leaving the hospital, so you grudgingly agree to your husband's favorite name, only to regret it for the next two weeks before finally accepting it (I'm not naming names here...).
Ultimately this leads to the much-pondered question, "does the name grow to suit the person or the person suit the name?" That is a discussion for another day.
Certainly there is no right or wrong method here, and I'm curious as to your thoughts: Be set on a name prior to the birth, have several options, or wing it?
However, I realize many people take a different, more diplomatic approach at the hospital/birthing center/home: have some names in mind, but go in with no expectations. For instance, my sister (who's baby girl is due any day) and her husband have three full names selected. They plan on seeing their daughter before deciding on one. Lindsay hopes they'll take one look and just know, but she's practical enough to know this does not always happen. Their strategy? They have one name they classify as very "delicate and beautiful, quite feminine," which they'll use if she has very fine, pretty features. The next name is reserved for a "cute, chubby, smooshy" baby. And the last? Well, they just decided on the last a week or two ago, mainly because Lindsay strongly felt they should go in with three names, not two. The last is their least favorite, they admit, but they like the meaning of it the best. Supposedly if the other two names seem not to fit, this last will work for a wide variety of babies. I'm most partial to their smooshy name myself, but all three are lovely, and I can't wait to find out who she is!
I also know of several people who did indeed go to the hospital etc. with a name all good and chosen, only to cast eyes upon their offspring and know instantly that the name would never do.
Another option is having no idea whatsoever what to name the baby, until two days after its birth you have to sign the birth certificate before leaving the hospital, so you grudgingly agree to your husband's favorite name, only to regret it for the next two weeks before finally accepting it (I'm not naming names here...).
Ultimately this leads to the much-pondered question, "does the name grow to suit the person or the person suit the name?" That is a discussion for another day.
Certainly there is no right or wrong method here, and I'm curious as to your thoughts: Be set on a name prior to the birth, have several options, or wing it?
Sunday, June 12, 2011
Naming Subsequent Babies: Part 3
Here are some final (for now) thoughts on naming subsequent babies. I'll add more to this series on occasion, but must move on!
---One way to end up with names that "go" together is to select names from the same era. This allows for a pretty broad range of names, while still providing some continuity. By "era," I don't necessarily mean a specific year or two, more than names that give the same vibe. For instance, I have a friend with two little girls, the first named "Claire" and the second named "Audrey." Both names have a kind of retro, sweet sound to them. The parents are expecting their third child, and they'll likely want to stay away from modern, trendy names that lack the whimsy of their first two names. Names that evoke the same vibe? Perhaps: Phoebe, Gemma, Lucy, Pearl, Sadie. For a boy, they'd want to keep the retro-sense, but avoid the sweetness. Something well established, recognizable but not too common would fit the bill: Todd, Victor, Simon, Quinton, Lucas, Thaddeus, or Winston would be some examples.
---Chatting with a friend yesterday, we discussed a less-themey take on a theme: keep a consistent sound to begin the names, but not necessarily with the same letters. This friend has two sons (Kiefer and Cooper). Were they to have a third child, a fun way to keep the "k" sound would be going with a "qu" name: "Quinton" or "Quincey" for a boy, or perhaps "Quinn" for a little girl.
---One friend commented on an earlier post that the only thing connecting their potential baby names is that they are all unusual. Really, this is an entirely acceptable approach to naming, and obscurity is as a good a connection as anything. As long as Siren, River Rock, and Caesar don't have a little brother named "John," people are unlikely to grumble that their names don't go together (though they're likely to find other reasons to grumble).
---Finally, spend some time rattling off names to see how they flow together. If your oldest child is "Shane" and you're planning on naming your new baby "Erin" or "Aaron," practice saying, "My kids, Shane and Erin." To me, "Shane and Erin" doesn't flow well- it's too full of "n's" and is awkwardly rhythmically. A better sounding combination would be "Shane and Olivia," or "Shane and Dierdre." That doesn't mean Shane shouldn't have a little sister Erin, it's just a word of caution.
Since for the next four months I'm still the mom of just one little one, what are your experiences with naming siblings? What factors did you consider or disregard? Any regrets?
---One way to end up with names that "go" together is to select names from the same era. This allows for a pretty broad range of names, while still providing some continuity. By "era," I don't necessarily mean a specific year or two, more than names that give the same vibe. For instance, I have a friend with two little girls, the first named "Claire" and the second named "Audrey." Both names have a kind of retro, sweet sound to them. The parents are expecting their third child, and they'll likely want to stay away from modern, trendy names that lack the whimsy of their first two names. Names that evoke the same vibe? Perhaps: Phoebe, Gemma, Lucy, Pearl, Sadie. For a boy, they'd want to keep the retro-sense, but avoid the sweetness. Something well established, recognizable but not too common would fit the bill: Todd, Victor, Simon, Quinton, Lucas, Thaddeus, or Winston would be some examples.
---Chatting with a friend yesterday, we discussed a less-themey take on a theme: keep a consistent sound to begin the names, but not necessarily with the same letters. This friend has two sons (Kiefer and Cooper). Were they to have a third child, a fun way to keep the "k" sound would be going with a "qu" name: "Quinton" or "Quincey" for a boy, or perhaps "Quinn" for a little girl.
---One friend commented on an earlier post that the only thing connecting their potential baby names is that they are all unusual. Really, this is an entirely acceptable approach to naming, and obscurity is as a good a connection as anything. As long as Siren, River Rock, and Caesar don't have a little brother named "John," people are unlikely to grumble that their names don't go together (though they're likely to find other reasons to grumble).
---Finally, spend some time rattling off names to see how they flow together. If your oldest child is "Shane" and you're planning on naming your new baby "Erin" or "Aaron," practice saying, "My kids, Shane and Erin." To me, "Shane and Erin" doesn't flow well- it's too full of "n's" and is awkwardly rhythmically. A better sounding combination would be "Shane and Olivia," or "Shane and Dierdre." That doesn't mean Shane shouldn't have a little sister Erin, it's just a word of caution.
Since for the next four months I'm still the mom of just one little one, what are your experiences with naming siblings? What factors did you consider or disregard? Any regrets?
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Naming Subsequent Babies: Part 2
Themes, of course, are not the only way to have a bit of continuity among sibling names. Another factor to consider is the sound of the names together. The goal, of course, is not to necessarily find names that sound "good" together so much as to avoid names that clearly sound BAD. Many names will sound just fine with when paired with the name of your first child, but undoubtedly you'll come across a few options that will make you cringe. Examples?
Aurora and: Flora (Rhyming is practically never a good idea); Doria (Too many "r's" and similar vowel sounds); Kay (very short and masculine next to the flowery "Aurora")
Rory and: Tori, Laurie, Corrie, etc. (See above); Riordan; Riley (Too similar)
Evan and: Evangeline (Seems obvious that one name should not contain the entirety of another); Alvin; Ivan (Share many similar sounds); Laban (I don't know why you'd name your kid after this guy, but especially don't do it if you already have one named "Evan.")
Abigail and: Gabrielle (The chance of having an "Abby" and a "Gabby" is just too high); Able (Imagine sputtering "Abigail" and "Able" if you're upset..."Ablegail!"
Able and: Cain (Good twin, bad twin. Good idea? Bad idea!!)
Michelle and: Barack (Naming siblings after husbands and wives is really, really weird to me.)
You get the point. Consider any potential sibling-related ramifications before bestowing a name on your second child, considering the melodiousness of the names (rhyming being too melodious) and any weird associations with the name of your first child.
Next time: Naming Subsequent Babies: Part 3!
Aurora and: Flora (Rhyming is practically never a good idea); Doria (Too many "r's" and similar vowel sounds); Kay (very short and masculine next to the flowery "Aurora")
Rory and: Tori, Laurie, Corrie, etc. (See above); Riordan; Riley (Too similar)
Evan and: Evangeline (Seems obvious that one name should not contain the entirety of another); Alvin; Ivan (Share many similar sounds); Laban (I don't know why you'd name your kid after this guy, but especially don't do it if you already have one named "Evan.")
Abigail and: Gabrielle (The chance of having an "Abby" and a "Gabby" is just too high); Able (Imagine sputtering "Abigail" and "Able" if you're upset..."Ablegail!"
Able and: Cain (Good twin, bad twin. Good idea? Bad idea!!)
Michelle and: Barack (Naming siblings after husbands and wives is really, really weird to me.)
You get the point. Consider any potential sibling-related ramifications before bestowing a name on your second child, considering the melodiousness of the names (rhyming being too melodious) and any weird associations with the name of your first child.
Next time: Naming Subsequent Babies: Part 3!
Friday, May 20, 2011
Naming Subsequent Babies
When naming your first child, the sky's the limit. When more babies come, however, the name chosen for the first limits the options for its siblings.
Now that Blake and are expecting number 2 (whom we affectionately refer to as "Once," (Ohn-say), which is "11" in Spanish. We jokingly were planning to have an 11-11-11 baby, thus the nickname.), we've had to give much thought to sibling names. There's much to consider, and this will be only one of multiple posts on the topic.
Today I'd like to address the theme of themes. some parents maintain a consistent theme for all of their children. Common themes include Biblical names, flower names, names that all begin with the same letter (usually "J" for some reason), family names, and virtue names, but the options are endless. Were Blake and I to choose a theme (based off the name of our first child), some options could be:
- More obscure nature names-"Aurora" can be connected to the Aurora Borealis; sibling name possibilities: Bay, Willow, Meadow (which I love, incidentally), Rio/River
- Disney names. Seriously, people ask. Sibling name possibilities: Pocahontas? Gaston?
- "A" names: Arthur, Andrew, Alexandra, Alice
- "A B C D etc." names, except we've already ruled out all "B" names, so that breaks the pattern pretty quick. Sibling names: Belinda, Chad, Dietrich, Elisa, etc.
- Heavenly names, like: Luna, Starr, Sunny
- Spanish or Latin names- "Aurora" is a fairly common name in Spanish. Sibling names: Diego (love it!), Caterina, Magdalena, Julio
There are some risks with opting to stick with a theme, though. For instance, inspiration could run out before the babies do. Imagine how little "Howie" would feel in a family of "Jesse, Jordan, Jamie, and Jill." Overzealous parents can pick a theme that turns out to provide few options, like "mountains." Where does one go after "Everest" and "Rainier?" Or, the parents of little girls might fall in love with the free spirit femininity of flower names, only to have a SON after "Dahlia," "Violet," and "Jasmine." "Thistle" and "Snapdragon" are not exactly manly names. Finally, a couple could absolutely fall in love with a name outside the theme, but cannot use it because it deviates from the rest of the kids. And, of course, you may get some snickers (not the candy bar), if you get too themey, though I don't think you should let that stop you!
Despite all this, I am not anti-theme. I think name themes can be an effective way to create a little unity amongst the children, and, if done appropriately, they can be clever and cute. Just exercise caution, because the line between cute and obnoxious is pretty thin, as is that between clever and absurd.
Whether or not you choose a theme to carry throughout your baby names, sibling names must "go" together in some way. "Rebekah" and "Martha" should not have a sister named "Ashlynn," though "Rochelle" and "Marlee" could.
More about sibling names next time!
Now that Blake and are expecting number 2 (whom we affectionately refer to as "Once," (Ohn-say), which is "11" in Spanish. We jokingly were planning to have an 11-11-11 baby, thus the nickname.), we've had to give much thought to sibling names. There's much to consider, and this will be only one of multiple posts on the topic.
Today I'd like to address the theme of themes. some parents maintain a consistent theme for all of their children. Common themes include Biblical names, flower names, names that all begin with the same letter (usually "J" for some reason), family names, and virtue names, but the options are endless. Were Blake and I to choose a theme (based off the name of our first child), some options could be:
- More obscure nature names-"Aurora" can be connected to the Aurora Borealis; sibling name possibilities: Bay, Willow, Meadow (which I love, incidentally), Rio/River
- Disney names. Seriously, people ask. Sibling name possibilities: Pocahontas? Gaston?
- "A" names: Arthur, Andrew, Alexandra, Alice
- "A B C D etc." names, except we've already ruled out all "B" names, so that breaks the pattern pretty quick. Sibling names: Belinda, Chad, Dietrich, Elisa, etc.
- Heavenly names, like: Luna, Starr, Sunny
- Spanish or Latin names- "Aurora" is a fairly common name in Spanish. Sibling names: Diego (love it!), Caterina, Magdalena, Julio
There are some risks with opting to stick with a theme, though. For instance, inspiration could run out before the babies do. Imagine how little "Howie" would feel in a family of "Jesse, Jordan, Jamie, and Jill." Overzealous parents can pick a theme that turns out to provide few options, like "mountains." Where does one go after "Everest" and "Rainier?" Or, the parents of little girls might fall in love with the free spirit femininity of flower names, only to have a SON after "Dahlia," "Violet," and "Jasmine." "Thistle" and "Snapdragon" are not exactly manly names. Finally, a couple could absolutely fall in love with a name outside the theme, but cannot use it because it deviates from the rest of the kids. And, of course, you may get some snickers (not the candy bar), if you get too themey, though I don't think you should let that stop you!
Despite all this, I am not anti-theme. I think name themes can be an effective way to create a little unity amongst the children, and, if done appropriately, they can be clever and cute. Just exercise caution, because the line between cute and obnoxious is pretty thin, as is that between clever and absurd.
Whether or not you choose a theme to carry throughout your baby names, sibling names must "go" together in some way. "Rebekah" and "Martha" should not have a sister named "Ashlynn," though "Rochelle" and "Marlee" could.
More about sibling names next time!
Monday, May 16, 2011
Combo-Names
A friend recently asked me my take on combo-names (combining parts of two or more names to come up with a new one). You probably won't be surprised to hear that I advise great caution when considering this concept. Many people see this as a terrific way to dodge the, "do we name her after your mom or mine?" question.
Thus, names like "Janeilica," a creative combination of "Janelle" and "Angelica" are born. Yikes. Blake and I had jokingly said that we'd give a baby girl the name "Raelynn," which happens to be a real name, after both of our mothers' middle names, "Rae" and "Lynn." But seeing as "Raelynn" is a little to mountain mama for our taste, it was never a serious possibility. Other combinations of their first names, "Diana" and "Marisa" lead to such humorous monikers as "Darisa," "Marana," and "Marisana." No, any baby of ours would be named after one person only, or none at all. However, I am in favor of the idea if the combo-name is indeed a real, respectable name (other than Raelynn!). For instance, the friend that inquired about this topic is named Aimee, and her husband is Bram. Put them together and you get "Abram!" While I probably wouldn't name a kid "Abram," it's a legitimate name, and clearly incorporates both of the parents.
So, if the idea of combo names intrigues you, go ahead an experiment. Just don't get too excited if the best you can come up with is "Janelica."
Thus, names like "Janeilica," a creative combination of "Janelle" and "Angelica" are born. Yikes. Blake and I had jokingly said that we'd give a baby girl the name "Raelynn," which happens to be a real name, after both of our mothers' middle names, "Rae" and "Lynn." But seeing as "Raelynn" is a little to mountain mama for our taste, it was never a serious possibility. Other combinations of their first names, "Diana" and "Marisa" lead to such humorous monikers as "Darisa," "Marana," and "Marisana." No, any baby of ours would be named after one person only, or none at all. However, I am in favor of the idea if the combo-name is indeed a real, respectable name (other than Raelynn!). For instance, the friend that inquired about this topic is named Aimee, and her husband is Bram. Put them together and you get "Abram!" While I probably wouldn't name a kid "Abram," it's a legitimate name, and clearly incorporates both of the parents.
So, if the idea of combo names intrigues you, go ahead an experiment. Just don't get too excited if the best you can come up with is "Janelica."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)